A descoberta (fracassada) da mítica Atlântida a Oeste da Madeira

Vince

Furacão
Registo
23 Jan 2007
Mensagens
10,624
Local
Braga
Há 2 semanas atrás começou a espalhar-se na Net o rumor de que a mítica Atlântida tinha sido descoberta a Oeste da Madeira/Sul dos Açores :D

40407059.jpg



Tal como com o GE (Google Earth) se começaram a fazer descobertas arqueológicas, com o lançamento do Google Oceans na última versão do GE, muita gente desatou a procurar coisas interessantes.

O que levou a isto tudo foram estes padrões geométricos na planície abissal da Madeira:


49303599.jpg



Alguns jornais chegaram mesmo a escrever sobre o assunto, como o Tablóide britânico «The Sun». Só podia :lmao:

Is this Atlantis?

atlantismainnew737373a.jpg


THIS is the amazing image which could show the fabled sunken city of Atlantis.

It shows a perfect rectangle the size of Wales lying on the bed of the Atlantic Ocean nearly 3½ miles down.

A host of criss-crossing lines, looking like a map of a vast metropolis, are enclosed by the boundary.

atlantismap380737685a.jpg


They seem too vast and organised to be caused naturally.

And last night the possibility of an extraordinary discovery had oceanographers and geophysicists captivated.

The site lies 620 miles off the west coast of Africa near the Canary Islands — a location for Atlantis seemingly suggested by the ancient philosopher Plato.

He believed it was an island civilisation sunk by an earthquake and floods around 9,700BC — nearly 12,000 years ago.

The “grid” showed up on Google Ocean, a Google Earth extension that uses a combination of satellite images and marine surveys.

Last night Dr Charles Orser, curator of historical archaeology at New York State University — and one of the world’s leading authorities on Atlantis — called it “fascinating”.

He said: “The site is one of the most prominent places for the proposed location of Atlantis, as described by Plato. Even if it turns out to be geographical, this definitely deserves a closer look.”

The legend of Atlantis has captured the imagination of scholars for centuries.

And in the 1970s it spawned a hit TV series, Man From Atlantis, in which Patrick Duffy played a webbed hero who could live underwater.

Situated in an area called the Madeira Abyssal Plane, the grid was spotted by aeronautical engineer Bernie Bamford as he browsed through Google Ocean.

Bernie, 38, of Chester, said: “It looks like an aerial map of Milton Keynes. It must be man-made.”

Google today claimed the criss-crossing lines were sonar data collected as boats mapped the ocean floor.

snn2005jjatlantisne7373.jpg


But the internet giant said “blank spots” within the lines could not be explained.

A spokeswoman said: “Bathymetric (or sea floor terrain) data is often collected from boats using sonar to take measurements of the sea floor.

“The lines reflect the path of the boat as it gathers the data.

“The fact that there are blank spots between each of these lines is a sign of how little we really know about the world’s oceans.”





Infelizmente a realidade é bem menos fascinante. A explicação para os padrões:


Atlantis? No, it Atlant-isn't.
2/23/2009 03:18:00 PM

[Note: Last week we saw some interesting speculation that Atlantis had been found in Google Earth. As much as we'd love for that to be the case, there is a scientific explanation for the odd markings found on the seafloor. We've invited two of the scientists who gathered the data that appears in Google Earth to answer some questions that came up. - Ed.]

Since the launch of Ocean in Google Earth, millions of people have started to explore the ocean, and many have been surprised by their discoveries.

Near Hawaii you can see a new volcanic island in the making called the Loihi Seamount.

picture1p.png


You can also clearly see the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, an underwater mountain range in the Atlantic Ocean where two tectonic plates are moving away from one another. If you look closely, you can see this ridge connects with others around the globe, forming a nearly continuous mountain range that is over 60,000 kilometers long.

picture2o.png


But so far nothing has sparked quite as much interest as this funny looking pattern off the west coast of Africa:

picture4.png


Patterns like this can actually be seen over much of the ocean floor in Google Earth. What is it? Is it real? Why does it look like this?

Some have speculated that these are the plow marks of seafloor farming by aliens. If there really are little green men hiding somewhere, the ocean's not a bad place to do it. Mars, Venus, the moon, and even some asteroids are mapped at far higher resolution than our own oceans (the global map of Mars is about 250 times as accurate as the global map of our own ocean).

One theory that's gained more traction is that these marks might be the ruins of the lost city of Atlantis. If that were the case, some of the city blocks would have to be over eight miles long - that's about fifty times the size of a city block in New York City (if you zoom in and use the measurement tool in Google Earth, you can do this comparison yourself).

So what is it? The scientific explanation is a bit less exotic, but we think it's still pretty interesting: these marks are what we call "ship tracks." You see, it's actually quite hard to measure the depth of the ocean. Sunlight, lasers, and other electromagnetic radiation can travel less than 100 feet below the surface, yet the typical depth in the ocean is more than two and a half miles. Sound waves are more effective. By measuring the time it takes for sound to travel from a ship to the sea floor and back, you can get an idea of how far away the sea floor is. Since this process — known as echosounding — only maps a strip of the sea floor under the ship, the maps it produces often show the path the ship took, hence the "ship tracks." In this case, the soundings produced by a ship are also about 1% deeper than the data we have in surrounding areas — likely an error — making the tracks stand out more. You can see all of the soundings that produced this particular pattern with this KMZ file.

picture5c.png


Echosounding with sonar is currently the best method for collecting this kind of data, but it's not perfect. One challenge is that it's quite slow. It has to be done from ships or underwater vehicles, and they can't go very fast or they'll spoil the measurement. As a result, not much of the ocean has been mapped this way, and huge gaps remain all over the ocean. In fact, the typical hole between tracks is about 20,000 square kilometers, or about the size of the state of New Jersey.

Now you're probably wondering where the rest of the depth data comes from if there are such big gaps from echosounding. We do our best to predict what the sea floor looks like based on what we can measure much more easily: the water surface. Above large underwater mountains (seamounts), the surface of the ocean is actually higher than in surrounding areas. These seamounts actually increase gravity in the area, which attracts more water and causes sea level to be slightly higher. The changes in water height are measurable using radar on satellites. This allows us to make a best guess as to what the rest of the sea floor looks like, but still at relatively low resolutions (the model predicts the ocean depth about once every 4000 meters). What you see in Google Earth is a combination of both this satellite-based model and real ship tracks from many research cruises (we first published this technique back in 1997). If you zoom in and take a look around the ocean for yourself, you can see higher resolution patches where ships have studied the sea floor and all the places we've still yet to explore. Here's a good example just north of Hawaii:

picture6f.png


So, what if we really wanted to find Atlantis? We probably couldn't do it with satellites — man-made structures simply aren't big enough to be measured that way. But we could map the whole ocean using ships. A published U.S. Navy study found that it would take about 200 ship-years, meaning we'd need one ship for 200 years, or 10 ships for 20 years, or 100 ships for two years. It costs about $25,000 per day to operate a ship with the right mapping capability, so 200 ship-years would cost nearly two billion dollars. That may seem like a lot of money, but it's not that far off from the price tag of, say, a new sports stadium.

For now, keep exploring the ocean in Google Earth, and continue to share what you discover. It's great to have so many sets of eyes looking at the data currently in Google Earth and asking questions about what it represents. We and our fellow oceanographers are constantly improving the resolution of our seafloor maps, so we promise to work with Google to keep the virtual explorers out there busy.

Posted by Walter Smith, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and David Sandwell, Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/atlantis-no-it-atlant-isnt.html
 

granizus

Cumulus
Registo
8 Jan 2009
Mensagens
181
Local
São Domingos de Rana / Lapa (Lisboa)
Embora a explicação faça sentido, o que não faz é o facto de essas linhas estarem quase integralmente delimitadas por um quadrado exterior. Como se os navios não deixassem rasto até chegar a esse local e de repente os deixassem perfeitamente impressos...

Quer marecer-me que a "descoberta" é tão tonta quanto a "explicação científica" :)
 

Vince

Furacão
Registo
23 Jan 2007
Mensagens
10,624
Local
Braga
Embora a explicação faça sentido, o que não faz é o facto de essas linhas estarem quase integralmente delimitadas por um quadrado exterior. Como se os navios não deixassem rasto até chegar a esse local e de repente os deixassem perfeitamente impressos...

Quer marecer-me que a "descoberta" é tão tonta quanto a "explicação científica" :)


Como o artigo refere, a cartografia do fundo dos Oceanos é feito de duas formas. Com Satélite ou com recurso a navios que rebocam um sonar especial chamado de Sonar de Banda Lateral (Side-scan sonar).

A cartografia de satélite tem pouca resolução/precisão. As de sonar são muito mais detalhadas. Mas obviamente só uma ínfima parte dos Oceanos está detalhada com recurso a sondagens destas. O Google Ocean recorre aos mapas batimétricos de ambas, tal como no Google Earth temos partes do território com fotografias de satélite de diferentes resoluções ou ainda zonas com fotografia aérea (a partir de avião) com muito mais detalhe do que a de satélite.

A questão que levantas é fácil de explicar. A maior parte do mapeamento feito com sonar foi feito em expedições cientificas e o modo como elas são feitas é precisamente assim, definem uma qualquer grelha dividida em mosaicos e percorrem toda a área para criarem um mapa batimétrico, daí a forma destes padrões. Pelo que os tais rastos só estão onde eles começaram a sondar.