O Estado do País

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rog
  • Data de início Data de início
Estado
Fechado para novas mensagens.
Um académico e um banqueiro suíços propõem reestruturar a dívida pública de todos os países membros da zona euro, através de uma compra massiva pelo Banco Central Europeu no mercado secundário de títulos no valor de 5 biliões de euros, cerca de metade do total da dívida, transformando-a de seguida em dívida perpétua sem juros. A proposta tem o curioso acrónimo de PADRE, em inglês (PADRE - Politically Acceptable Debt Restructuring in the Eurozone; Reestruturação de dívida da zona euro politicamente aceitável). Os autores recusam considerar esta reestruturação um perdão de dívida.

Portugal seria beneficiário da operação, com um abate de mais de 100 mil milhões de euros, cerca de 55% da dívida pública.

O Expresso entrevista em exclusivo um dos autores, Charles Wyplosz, professor de Economia Internacional no Graduate Institute de Genebra, e membro do grupo de conselheiros económicos do Presidente da Comissão Europeia e do painel de peritos do Comité de Assuntos Económicos e Monetários do Parlamento Europeu.
Não há milagres grátis

A nova renegociação dos prazos dos empréstimos europeus à Grécia trouxe de volta o tema das reestruturações de dívida pública na zona euro.

Mas como não há "milagres" grátis, a proposta acarreta uma "condicionalidade" pesada. Depende de condições políticas apertadas a aceitar pelos beneficiários, refere-nos Ricardo Cabral, professor da Universidade da Madeira, que analisou a proposta. "Um espartilho orçamental reforçado", quer em termos de défice estrutural (o que já tem sido implementado com a célebre "regra de ouro") como de teto da dívida pública (com uma folga de 10 pontos percentuais) que teria de ficar inscrito na Constituição e onde possível referendado. O cumprimento desses limites seria analisado semestralmente

O artigo refere as diversas propostas de reestruturação e mutualização da dívida pública que têm surgido.

http://expresso.sapo.pt/apagar-mais-de-metade-da-divida-com-ajuda-do-bce=f856193
 
A CGD outro ano de prejuizos...será que vão continuar a dar mais feriados/pontes e "não" cortes aos seus trabalhadores, pois podem ser contratados por bancos da concorrencia:lol::lol::lol::lol:
http://www.rtp.pt/noticias/index.php?article=717026&tm=6&layout=122&visual=61

“Se o assunto fosse para brincar diria que a CGD vai voltar aos lucros quando o Benfica for campeão. Como é sério, não posso brincar”, declarou José Matos, durante a apresentação das contas de 2013, ao ser inquirido sobre quais as expectativas de regresso aos lucros por parte do maior grupo bancário português. O CEO adiantou, em todo o caso, que “2014 será melhor que 2013 e quando a economia portuguesa recuperar e voltar à velocidade de cruzeiro os lucros da CGD vão aparecer e serão robustos.” No futuro, sublinhou, “estamos em melhores condições para prosseguir os nossos objectivos estratégicos”.

http://www.publico.pt/economia/noti...aramse-em-2013-para-os-576-milhoes-1623754#/0

Enfim, "não brincando" disse aquilo que iria dizer se estivesse a brincar :maluco: Muito governo equivale a pouco crescimento económico. É esta a retórica predominante. Então esses CEO's todos que se "prostituem" no público e no privado (às vezes simultaneamente) são o quê? Incompetentes no público e competentes no privado?
 
“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.”

Napoleon Bonaparte
 
  • Gosto
Reactions: Orion e CptRena
A probabilidade de incumprimento da dívida grega desceu de 34,15% no final de 2013 para 27,45% a 14 de fevereiro, segundo dados da S&P Capital IQ. Foi uma redução de mais de 150 pontos base em apenas mês e meio no preço dos credit default swaps (cds) a 5 anos, que funcionam como seguros financeiros contra o risco de incumprimento.

Em virtude dessa descida significativa, a Grécia posiciona-se em 9º lugar no conjunto das 10 economias com o risco mais alto de bancarrota, a pouca distância de El Salvador que ocupa a 10ª posição.

O anúncio de que estão em curso negociações para uma extensão muito significativa dos prazos de vencimento dos empréstimos dos Fundos europeus de resgate, que poderão concluir-se em março ou abril, teve um impacto positivo significativo na perceção do risco da dívida grega, que, no entanto, continua classificada como altamente especulativa pelas agências de rating.

Pressão política pré-eleitoral

Há uma enorme pressão política na Comissão Europeia e em Atenas para concluir o "exame" pela troika, que se arrasta desde setembro. A troika deve regressar à capital helénica na próxima semana e Yannis Stournaras, o ministro das Finanças, regressa amanhã a Bruxelas. O objetivo é fechar, se possível, o tema grego até à reunião do Eurogrupo de 10 de março.

As eleições europeias de maio surgem no horizonte como um ponto de viragem se o partido de oposição Syriza confirmar os ganhos nas sondagens, que o dão com um a dois pontos percentuais acima da Nova Democracia que lidera a coligação governamental com o PASOK. O risco político poderá regressar se houver pressão para eleições legislativas antecipadas ainda em 2014 ou em fevereiro de 2015 com as eleições presidenciais.


Entre o final de 2013 e o fecho na sexta-feira passada, o custo dos cds desceu quase 300 pontos base para Chipre e 94 pontos base para Portugal. Chipre desceu da 3ª para a 6ª posição naquele período e Portugal saiu daquele "clube" no final de 2013.

A Grécia entrou para o "clube da bancarrota" no último trimestre de 2008, na última posição. No primeiro trimestre de 2009 subiu para o 8º lugar com um risco de 25,4%. Na altura Portugal tinha um risco de apenas 12%. No "clube", a Grécia tinha por companheiras a Islândia e a Letónia, em termos de economias europeias. Portugal só entraria para o "clube" em abril de 2010.

Pico do risco no final de 2011

O pico do risco para a Grécia verifica-se no quarto trimestre de 2011, registando 93,8%, uma situação de bancarrota iminente. A Grécia liderava, então, o "clube", logo seguida de Portugal com 60,8%, que, apesar de já estar também resgatado, veria o risco disparar ao longo de 2011 até um pico no final de janeiro de 2012. Na altura, a Irlanda ocupava o 6º lugar e a Itália o 10º.

Com a decisão da Cimeira Europeia de 8 de dezembro de 2011 em proceder a uma reestruturação da dívida grega na mão dos credores privados, uma solução que era há muito defendida pelo Fundo Monetário Internacional, a Grécia entrou em situação de default parcial e o seu lugar na liderança foi ocupado por Portugal e depois por Chipre. A reestruturação seria concluída em abril de 2012 e a Grécia regressou à liderança do grupo.

Em 2013, a Grécia desceu para a 6ª posição no terceiro trimestre. No fecho da semana passada desceu para o 9º lugar.

A rentabilidade anual (últimas 52 semanas) da dívida obrigacionista grega é a mais elevada entre as economias desenvolvidas segundo o índice da Bloomberg. Está acima de 40%; em termos comparativos, o retorno anual das obrigações portuguesas está um pouco acima de 13%.

A dívida pública grega tem 20 linhas de obrigações (reestruturadas em 2012) com maturidades de 10, 15 e 30 anos. A maturidade média da dívida obrigacionista é de 17,7 anos e a taxa anual de juro efetiva é de 7,58%. No caso de Portugal, há 13 linhas de obrigações com uma maturidade média de 6,25 anos e uma taxa efetiva de 3,7%.

http://expresso.sapo.pt/grecia-a-beira-de-sair-do-clube-da-bancarrota=f856285

"Antão" a Grécia vai sair da bancarrota mesmo apesar de precisar de mais um pacote de ajuda e de ter que reestruturar a dívida (novamente). Os parágrafos sublinhados dizem tudo, eleições à porta miraculosamente melhora tudo. Palhaços mudam mas o circo é sempre o mesmo. Depois das eleições voltará a propaganda da fuga ao fisco, dos défices e dos preguiçosos.
 
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
–C.S. Lewis, “God in the Dock”

“By today’s standards, King George III was a very mild tyrant indeed. He taxed his American colonists at a rate of only pennies per annum. His actual impact on their personal lives was trivial. He had arbitrary power over them in law and in principle, but in fact it was seldom exercised. If you compare his rule with that of today’s U.S. Government, you have to wonder why we celebrate our independence.”
–Joseph Sobran

“America is sliding deeper and deeper into a politically correct, scholastically indoctrinated, regulated, credentialed, homogenized and degenerate hole. If catastrophe does not interrupt this decline (as it surely will), then America shall become a land of subhuman semi-illiterates, utterly dependent on government, profoundly alienated from one another and entertained to the point of stupefaction.”
–J. R. Nyquist

“If you want to remain slaves of the bankers and pay for the costs of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and control the nation’s credit.”

–Sir Josiah Stamp [1880-1941]
 
Um estudo de uma investigadora da Universidade de Aveiro não podia ser mais claro: as nomeações para a Administração Pública respondem a interesses partidários, estejam o PSD, o PS ou o CDS-PP no Governo.

Não há diferenças entre os partidos do arco do Governo no que diz respeito aos chamados "tachos", as nomeações para a Administração Pública (AP) com base em interesses e pressões partidários.

"PSD, CDS e PS são duas faces da mesma moeda", resume Patrícia Silva, investigadora da Universidade de Aveiro (UA), que analisou uma amostra de 11 mil nomeações para a Administração Pública realizadas entre 1995 e 2009, período que abarca dois governos PS (António Guterres e José Sócrates) e um do PSD/CDS (Durão Barroso/Santana Lopes).

A autora do trabalho de doutoramento "Novos dilemas, velhas soluções? Patronagem e Governos Partidários" concluiu que as nomeações para a cúpula da AP em Portugal são influenciadas por interesses partidários para recompensar serviços prestados ao partido do poder.

http://www.jn.pt/PaginaInicial/Politica/Interior.aspx?content_id=3690030

Mas... qual é a novidade? :lol:
 
  • Gosto
Reactions: CptRena
O ministro da Economia, António Pires de Lima, admite ter cometido um "excesso de linguagem" ao utilizar a expressão "milagre económico", mas sublinha que é preferível exagerar nos elogios às empresas do que desvalorizar os sinais de retoma económica, como acusa a oposição de fazer.

Nesta segunda-feira à noite, antes de intervir nas jornadas Portugal no rumo certo. Mais Indústria. Melhor Economia. Mais Emprego, organizadas por PSD e CDS, o governante disse estar certo de que "toda a gente percebeu" o que ele queria significar ao falar de "milagre económico", mesmo que o recurso à expressão tenha sido "manifestamente um excesso de linguagem”.

"Acho que é bem preferível, eventualmente, exagerar nos elogios que eu tenho feito às empresas por serem as grandes obreiras desta recuperação económica, tendo como parceiro o papel do Estado e do Governo do que, permanentemente, como fazem os partidos da oposição, desvalorizar os sinais de retoma económica, de crescimento económico, desvalorizando com isso o esforço que as empresas têm estado a fazer”, defendeu.

http://www.publico.pt/politica/noti...que-falou-foi-um-excesso-de-linguagem-1624122

Inacreditável, já nem sabem o que hão-de dizer. Parece um infantário. Haja paciência para politiquices.

P.S. A propaganda política é tão nojenta que o Min. da Economia tem a lata de dizer:

"como fazem os partidos da oposição, desvalorizar os sinais de retoma económica, de crescimento económico, desvalorizando com isso o esforço que as empresas têm estado a fazer”

Não sou fã do PS mas quando é que eles desvalorizaram o esforço das empresas? Usam uma crítica para implicitamente sugerir outra crítica que nunca foi feita. Propaganda no seu melhor. Nojo de gente.
 
Última edição:
Um mundo à parte

Nós estamos + à frente...dormimos na assembleia.

Ministros alemães dormem nos gabinetes para poupar dinheiro

Os ministros alemães estão a dormir nos gabinetes para pouparem dinheiro. O Estado paga apenas o gabinete de trabalho, não suportando os custos de uma residência particular para os ministros. Deste modo, muitos estão a optar por dormir no local de trabalho.

A notícia é avançada pela “Spiegel” que acrescenta ainda que já são vários os ministros a optar por este método. A ministra dos Assuntos da Família, Manuela Schwesig, é uma das visadas. O gabinete desta ministra tem cozinha e casa de banho o que facilita que Manuela Schwesig pernoite.

Os nomes da ministra da Defesa, Ursula von der Leyen, e os ministros da Justiça e do Emprego também são mencionados pela publicação.

Este método que os ministros adoptaram para não pagar aluguer de uma casa particular já está a levantar críticas por parte da oposição. Esta defende que caso os governantes utilizem os gabinetes como local de habitação, devem declará-lo nos impostos.
http://www.ionline.pt/artigos/dinhei...-nos-gabinetes
 
  • Gosto
Reactions: CptRena
Hoje assinala-se o Dia Mundial da Justiça Social e a TSF escreve, com base em dados do Eurostat, que Portugal é o país da União Europeia em que o rendimento global das famílias está concentrado maioritariamente nos mais ricos.

Em 2011, 27,3% do rendimento global das famílias estava concentrado na fatia dos 10% mais ricos do país. Este valor estava 3,4 pontos percentuais acima da média europeia, o que faz de Portugal o país com maiores desigualdades na distribuição de rendimento.

A TSF conversou Frederico Cantante, investigador no Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia do ISCTE-IUL que explicou que esta diferença na distribuição de riqueza está relacionada com as diferenças salarias que se praticam no país.

“A economia portuguesa tem-se baseado em grande medida, apesar de alguma evolução, nos baixos salários e no trabalho pouco qualificado”, sublinhou, assegurando que acredita que estas diferenças aumentaram em 2012 e 2013 devido à crise.

http://www.noticiasaominuto.com/economia/177203/ricos-portugueses-concentram-27-3-dos-rendimentos
 
Acho que faz mais sentido neste tópico porque afeta-nos a todos:

The Vampire Squid Strikes Again: The Mega Banks' Most Devious Scam Yet

Call it the loophole that destroyed the world. It's 1999, the tail end of the Clinton years. While the rest of America obsesses over Monica Lewinsky, Columbine and Mark McGwire's biceps, Congress is feverishly crafting what could yet prove to be one of the most transformative laws in the history of our economy – a law that would make possible a broader concentration of financial and industrial power than we've seen in more than a century.

But the crazy thing is, nobody at the time quite knew it. Most observers on the Hill thought the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 – also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act – was just the latest and boldest in a long line of deregulatory handouts to Wall Street that had begun in the Reagan years.

Wall Street had spent much of that era arguing that America's banks needed to become bigger and badder, in order to compete globally with the German and Japanese-style financial giants, which were supposedly about to swallow up all the world's banking business. So through legislative lackeys like red-faced Republican deregulatory enthusiast Phil Gramm, bank lobbyists were pushing a new law designed to wipe out 60-plus years of bedrock financial regulation. The key was repealing – or "modifying," as bill proponents put it – the famed Glass-Steagall Act separating bankers and brokers, which had been passed in 1933 to prevent conflicts of interest within the finance sector that had led to the Great Depression. Now, commercial banks would be allowed to merge with investment banks and insurance companies, creating financial megafirms potentially far more powerful than had ever existed in America.

All of this was big enough news in itself. But it would take half a generation – till now, basically – to understand the most explosive part of the bill, which additionally legalized new forms of monopoly, allowing banks to merge with heavy industry. A tiny provision in the bill also permitted commercial banks to delve into any activity that is "complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety or soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally."

"From the perspective of the banks," says Saule Omarova, a law professor at the University of North Carolina, "pretty much everything is considered complementary to a financial activity."

Fifteen years later, in fact, it now looks like Wall Street and its lawyers took the term to be a synonym for ruthless campaigns of world domination. "Nobody knew the reach it would have into the real economy," says Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown. Now a leading voice on the Hill against the hidden provisions, Brown actually voted for Gramm-Leach-Bliley as a congressman, along with all but 72 other House members. "I bet even some of the people who were the bill's advocates had no idea."

Today, banks like Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs own oil tankers, run airports and control huge quantities of coal, natural gas, heating oil, electric power and precious metals. They likewise can now be found exerting direct control over the supply of a whole galaxy of raw materials crucial to world industry and to society in general, including everything from food products to metals like zinc, copper, tin, nickel and, most infamously thanks to a recent high-profile scandal, aluminum. And they're doing it not just here but abroad as well: In Denmark, thousands took to the streets in protest in recent weeks, vampire-squid banners in hand, when news came out that Goldman Sachs was about to buy a 19 percent stake in Dong Energy, a national electric provider. The furor inspired mass resignations of ministers from the government's ruling coalition, as the Danish public wondered how an American investment bank could possibly hold so much influence over the state energy grid.

There are more eclectic interests, too. After 9/11, we found it worrisome when foreigners started to get into the business of running ports, but there's been little controversy as banks have done the same, or even started dabbling in other activities with national-security implications – Goldman Sachs, for instance, is apparently now in the uranium business, a piece of news that attracted few headlines.

But banks aren't just buying stuff, they're buying whole industrial processes. They're buying oil that's still in the ground, the tankers that move it across the sea, the refineries that turn it into fuel, and the pipelines that bring it to your home. Then, just for kicks, they're also betting on the timing and efficiency of these same industrial processes in the financial markets – buying and selling oil stocks on the stock exchange, oil futures on the futures market, swaps on the swaps market, etc.

Allowing one company to control the supply of crucial physical commodities, and also trade in the financial products that might be related to those markets, is an open invitation to commit mass manipulation. It's something akin to letting casino owners who take book on NFL games during the week also coach all the teams on Sundays.

The situation has opened a Pandora's box of horrifying new corruption possibilities, but it's been hard for the public to notice, since regulators have struggled to put even the slightest dent in Wall Street's older, more familiar scams. In just the past few years we've seen an explosion of scandals – from the multitrillion-dollar Libor saga (major international banks gaming world interest rates), to the more recent foreign-currency-exchange fiasco (many of the same banks suspected of rigging prices in the $5.3-trillion-a-day currency markets), to lesser scandals involving manipulation of interest-rate swaps, and gold and silver prices.

But those are purely financial schemes. In these new, even scarier kinds of manipulations, banks that own whole chains of physical business interests have been caught rigging prices in those industries. For instance, in just the past two years, fines in excess of $400 million have been levied against both JPMorgan Chase and Barclays for allegedly manipulating the delivery of electricity in several states, including California. In the case of Barclays, which is contesting the fine, regulators claim prices were manipulated to help the bank win financial bets it had made on those same energy markets.

And last summer, The New York Times described how Goldman Sachs was caught systematically delaying the delivery of metals out of a network of warehouses it owned in order to jack up rents and artificially boost prices.

You might not have been surprised that Goldman got caught scamming the world again, but it was certainly news to a lot of people that an investment bank with no industrial expertise, just five years removed from a federal bailout, stores and controls enough of America's aluminum supply to affect world prices.

How was all of this possible? And who signed off on it?

By exploiting loopholes in a dense, decade-and-a-half-old piece of financial legislation, Wall Street has effected a revolutionary change that American citizens never discussed, debated or prepared for, and certainly never explicitly permitted in any meaningful way: the wholesale merger of high finance with heavy industry. This blitzkrieg reorganization of our economy has left millions of Americans facing a smorgasbord of frightfully unexpected new problems. Do we even have a regulatory structure in place to look out for these new forms of manipulation? (Answer: We don't.) And given that the banking sector that came so close to ruining the world economy five years ago has now vastly expanded its footprint, who's in charge of preventing the next crash?

In this Brave New World, nobody knows. Moreover, whatever we've done, it's too late to have a referendum on it. Garrett Wotkyns, an Arizona-based class-action attorney who has spent more than a year investigating the banks' involvement in the metals markets and is suing Goldman and others over the aluminum case on behalf of two major manufacturers, puts it this way: "It's like that line in The Dark Knight Rises," he says. "'The storm isn't coming. The storm is already here.'"

Página 1 de 5. Resto do artigo em:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...the-mega-banks-most-devious-scam-yet-20140212

Só teorias da conspiração, só teorias da conspiração... :lmao:

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

5 banqueiros (maioria em lugares elevados) no último mês suicidaram-se. O Max Keiser (para quem conhece) indica que outros 15 foram encontrados mortos mas não foram noticiados. Facto estranho...
 
Continuará a haver guerra enquanto se puder lucrar com isso. E para mostrar que as coisas não acontecem só nos outros países:

Nazi Gold and Portugal's Murky Role

As World War II raged across Europe, Portugal sold tungsten and other goods to Nazi Germany, profiting handsomely from its neutral status in the conflict. The Nazis paid with gold bullion looted from countries they conquered and, it is suspected, from victims of the Holocaust.

After the Nazis lost the war, Portugal secretly sold off some of this gold to Indonesia, the Philippines and above all China, working through Macao, its colonial enclave near Hong Kong.

Those sales, disclosed for the first time by a former senior minister who insisted on anonymity, were the final chapter in a story that has now come back to haunt Portugal's central bank and some of the country's more prominent business families.

Fifty years after the defeat of Germany, Europe has been stunned by a stream of revelations about Nazi gold: who handled it, where it came from and who reaped financial rewards from genocide.

The issue initially arose in Switzerland, where investigators are now examining the Swiss financial transactions with the Nazis and the fate of lost Jewish wealth in World War II.

In recent months, the focus has broadened to include Sweden, Spain and Portugal, where newspapers and historians are raising a separate set of questions about the role of local banks in financing trade and collaborating with the Nazi regime.

At the same time, the Poles have ordered an investigation into the missing wealth of Poland's victims. The Netherlands, too, plans an inquiry to find out what happened to 75 tons of public and private gold, half of the total plundered, which is still missing.

The story of the Nazis' gold has struck a particular nerve in Lisbon because, after Switzerland, Portugal was the largest importer of the gold. The country was officially neutral during the war but its regime had strong Nazi sympathies.

Like a dark, forgotten ghost, Lisbon's past has revived with tales of the city as a pivotal center for spies and a place of unscrupulous deals, where weapons and goods were transshipped to support the German war machine.

Older people here say they knew that the country's neutrality was a useful cover for doing business with all sides. But few had heard of the enormous gold trade with Germany.

According to Allied records, close to 100 tons of Nazi gold ended up in Portugal after first passing through Swiss banks that were apparently helping to disguise its origins. Almost half of this gold is believed to have been stolen from the treasuries of European countries that fell to the Nazis.

Records of Portugal's wartime dealings have recently been revealed in the news media here, astonishing today's generation of Portuguese. They also appear to have embarrassed the establishment deeply. President Jorge Sampaio and Prime Minister Antonio Guterres have discussed the issue in meetings of the Cabinet, but have so far declined to comment publicly.

Until 1968, when the dictator Antonio Salazar retired, censorship was used to keep secrets. When Portugal became a democracy in 1974, there were more pressing matters like the leftist revolution and the independence of the colonies.

Now, politicians, historians, students and news organizations are demanding that the Government open its archives and give a full accounting of collaboration with Hitler.

''It's a political and a moral issue,'' said Fernando Rosas, a professor of contemporary history at New University in Lisbon. ''This Government should speak out. It's not their doing.''

The Bank of Portugal, which occupies a somber building on the downtown Rua do Comercio, has long had a venerable image, but recent celebrations of its 150th anniversary were clouded by the public debate about its Nazi collaboration. It declined to send representatives to recent round-table discussions on the gold issue organized by the city of Lisbon, television stations and universities.

Because the bank had a monopoly over the gold trade until after the war, its archives are considered vital. But it has spurned requests from historians and journalists for access to wartime documents, saying it is bound by strict secrecy laws. The bank has promised to study the matter.

Down in its vaults, the bank still has ''two or three'' gold bars stamped with swastikas, according to Nuno Jonet, a bank official.

''We kept them as curiosities, Mr. Jonet said. ''We do not admit any wrongdoing. The gold acquisition was the result of perfectly legal trade operations. I'm sure people at the time did not know the gold coming here was stolen.''

Portugal used the same arguments before the Allied Tripartite Commission, which was in charge of recovering stolen gold after the war. American officials tried to pressure Portugal to surrender 44 tons of gold by freezing its assets in the United States and cutting back on wheat exports.

But the Salazar regime did not budge. In 1953 the Allies finally gave up, accepting the four tons Lisbon offered to return and letting it keep the rest.

''By then the cold war was under way and the Americans wanted to keep the Azores as a strategic base,'' said Jose Freire Antunes, who has written a history of the Azores.

Both Portugal and Switzerland insist that they were not aware that the Nazi gold they used for trade had been looted.

Antonio Louca, a historian at New University who is writing a doctoral thesis on Portugal's dealings in Nazi gold, dismisses these claims.

He said that as early as 1942 the Allies officially notified Western countries that Nazis were disposing of stolen gold through Swiss banks. Mr. Louca said he has recently obtained documents from Portugal's Foreign Ministry archives that cite the warning.

Old trade records tell part of the story: in 1940, less than 2 percent of Portugal's exports went to Germany; by 1942, that figure had reached 24.4 percent. Portugal sent Germany textiles, boots and food, but it earned most from tungsten, an alloy used in steel, which was indispensable to the Nazi war machine.

''At the height of the tungsten fever, prices in Lisbon increased by up to 1,700 percent,'' one history book reports.

Lisbon was also a crucial intermediary for Berlin, bringing insulin and industrial diamonds from Latin America and food from its African colonies and selling Nazi gold in South America. A businessman whose foreign company had a long presence here said: ''Salazar, the President, was the master of wartime neutrality. He charged extortionary prices.''

The full story of Portugal's Nazi gold may not be hidden in bank ledgers. There were other, secret channels.

Mr. Louca, the historian, said he has obtained German documents, recently declassified, that show that in 1944 couriers were secretly running large gold shipments from Germany to its embassy in Lisbon. The couriers bypassed the Portuguese central bank and sold the gold locally.

The documents raise several disturbing questions and touch briefly on the fate of one large and wealthy Jewish family.

By the summer of 1944, Europe was in chaos. German forces had occupied Hungary, an ally, when it took steps to withdraw from the war, and the Nazis had captured several members of the Weiss-Chorin family, owners of the country's largest industrial empire.

Under duress, the family made a deal with the SS, according to postwar American intelligence reports: the Nazis would get a large part of the Weiss empire and the family could leave Hungary. At least 44 family members left, of whom 32 arrived in Portugal in June 1944.

In July, the German Embassy in Lisbon began complaining in telegrams to Berlin that the gold price in Lisbon was dropping. Berlin responded by asking if this was a result of the sales by the couriers or sales by the Weiss family, which it suspected of bringing valuables from Hungary. Members of the Weiss family have said they brought no gold to Lisbon.

''Why was this gold coming here and why did the couriers not sell the German gold to the central bank?'' Mr. Louca said. ''The chances are that the gold included coins and jewelry, which had been stolen from individuals.''

Buyers reportedly included Portuguese businessmen and bankers, some of whom still own large establishments today.

After the war, the Allies demanded that Portugal give back at least 44 tons of looted Nazi gold. But Lisbon instead began to sell off its Nazi bullion secretly through Macao, with much of it going to China in the 1950's and 60's.

According to a government official who was himself involved in supervising numerous shipments, the China-bound gold was flown from Portugal to Macao, and from there moved across the Chinese border. The former official said some ingots sent to Macao were still embossed with the sealof the Dutch Treasury, which had been plundered by the Nazis; others were marked with swastikas. A number of bars were carried from Macao to the Philippines and Indonesia, strapped on people's bodies, the official said.

Historians, politicians and journalists are demanding that the Lisbon Government tell all. Fernando Rosas, the professor who is also editor of the prestigious magazine Historia, said the Government must allow free research and clarify the whole issue. ''The country needs to know the truth,'' he said.

Mr. Louca wonders if the gold story will ever be fully unraveled.

''Looting monetary gold was one thing -- stealing it from individuals, from victims, is another,'' he said. ''There is evidence that both types of gold came to Portugal.'' But, he added, even if new details spill out of official archives, it may be too difficult to separate the different sources of gold.

http://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/10/world/nazi-gold-and-portugal-s-murky-role.html?src=pm&pagewanted=1
 
Estado
Fechado para novas mensagens.